Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assig
> from the last /8. The last /8 policy makes it explicit that the minimum
> allocation is /22.
it does not. it says the then minimum allocation.
> If for example, someone comes along and asks for a /24 (for
> multihoming, ccTLD, IXPs, whatever..), would it still make sense to
> require them to justify a /23 and give them a /22.
actually, i have proposed to terence that he and i write a proposal to
reduce the minimum allocation to /24 when the last /8 days arrive.