Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assig
One question that this proposal does raise is the minimum allocation
from the last /8. The last /8 policy makes it explicit that the minimum
allocation is /22.
If for example, someone comes along and asks for a /24 (for multihoming,
ccTLD, IXPs, whatever..), would it still make sense to require them to
justify a /23 and give them a /22.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----