Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assig
We have 16K /22 for distribution in the final /8,
all CI assignments we made are just about 100*/24,
there is just a little impact to the final /8.
Technically, there are many option to operate TLDs,
of course, they can use space from their upstreams,
they can even rent the whole facility from a provider too...
The thing we propose is to give them options as what we are doing currently,
what do we gain by keeping them from getting portable assignments?
Regards
Terence Zhang
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg dot com>
To: "Terence Zhang YH" <zhangyinghao at cnnic dot cn>
Cc: "Philip Smith" <pfs at cisco dot com>; <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assignments from the final /8
>> ICANN recent launched Internationalized Domain Name country code TLDs
>> (IDN ccTLDs) Fast Track Process and there are ongoing discussion on
>> new generic top-level domain (gTLDs) programs, we can expect dozens of
>> IDN ccTLDs and gTLDs will be created in the next few years.
>> Those new TLD operators may not have existing IPv4 addresses.
>
> and, along with a million other folk, they will learn that ipv4 has run
> out.
>
> what is it people don't get about GONE, NO MORE, WE'RE OUT, THERE ARE
> NONE, WE AIN'T GOT ANY, ...?
>
> they can use space from their upstreams. i am sure they will figure it out.
>
> [ unless, as pfs points out, they qaulify under the final /8 policy ]
>
> randy
>