Re: [sig-policy] prop-064: Change to assignment policy for ASnumbers

To: zhangjian <zhangjian at cnnic dot cn>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-064: Change to assignment policy for ASnumbers
From: Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab at lahai dot com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:58:25 +0100
Cc: 'APNIC Policy SIG List' <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <416949315.23090 at cnnic dot cn>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <416949315.23090@cnnic.cn>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I support this proposal. +1.


Though something caught my eye here..

|
|    - The extent of people unwilling to support 4-byte AS numbers will be
|      known and documented. This will provide feedback as to the state of
|      deployment and readiness to begin general assignments.


I am not sure if communications between APNIC hostmasters and members
can be made public or if there is precedence on publishing such data. If
not, my suggestion would be to add a section on required reporting for
2009-2010 detailing nonacceptance of 4byte ASNs.

thanks
~ -gaurab

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiMKqEACgkQSo7fU26F3X0FKACbBAOZ0YUCjZdm7qVphWUK4GOu
+3oAni2dR9rLCsFMG16ZiT4nEsBTq2mU
=ifxu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----