Re: [sig-policy] prop-061-v001: 32-bit ASNs for documentation purposes

To: Philip Smith <pfs at cisco dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-061-v001: 32-bit ASNs for documentation purposes
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:25:43 +0100
Cc: APNIC Policy SIG List <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <488C1F21.2000609 at cisco dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <487B12CB.40508@psg.com> <200807142237.m6EMbZ7T065411@burn.telstra.net> <487C0C6B.3040104@apnic.net> <487C1376.5040801@cisco.com> <200807150402.m6F42K3Q068526@burn.telstra.net> <488479BD.2030407@cisco.com> <200807220007.m6M07XZR071346@burn.telstra.net> <488C1F21.2000609@cisco.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)

> Neither APNIC nor the Policy SIG Chairs have told us that this policy
> proposal is inappropriate for the Policy SIG meeting to consider.

i thought i/we specifically said it seemed ok.  there is precedent.
barring comment from policy queen sam, it seems pretty simple stuff.
would hardly seem worth much discussion.

randy, with chair hat on