Re: [sig-policy] prop-064: Change to assignment policy for ASnumbers

To: Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab at lahai dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-064: Change to assignment policy for ASnumbers
From: James Spenceley <james at iroute dot org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:20:33 +1000
Cc: APNIC Policy SIG List <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <488C2AA1.1000501 at lahai dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <416949315.23090@cnnic.cn> <488C2AA1.1000501@lahai.com>


On 27/07/2008, at 5:58 PM, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya wrote:



I support this proposal. +1.


Thanks Gaurab,

| - The extent of people unwilling to support 4-byte AS numberswill be| known and documented. This will provide feedback as to thestate of
|      deployment and readiness to begin general assignments.


I am not sure if communications between APNIC hostmasters and members
can be made public or if there is precedence on publishing suchdata. If
not, my suggestion would be to add a section on required reporting for
2009-2010 detailing nonacceptance of 4byte ASNs.

Publishing individual data wasn't the intent of the plan (issues with

NDAs etc), I do however expect that we could get an overview of the

percentage of applications with providers/peers unwilling to support 4

Byte ASNs.


--
James