|
Dear
SIG members Version
2 of the proposal 'Change to assignment policy for AS numbers' has
been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the Policy SIG
at APNIC The
proposal's history can be found at:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-064-v002.html The
updated proposal adds a specific date for the intermediary stage described in
section 4.3 of the proposal. We
invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list before the
meeting. The
comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an important part
of the policy development process. We encourage you to express your views on
the proposal:
- Do you support or oppose this proposal?
- Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
tell the community about your situation.
- Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
- Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
- What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
effective? Randy
and Jian ________________________________________________________________________ prop-064-v001:
Change to assignment policy for AS numbers
________________________________________________________________________ Authors:
James Spenceley
james at vocus dot com dot au Version:
1 Date:
22 July 2008 1.
Introduction ---------------- The
policy seeks to create awareness earlier within the community for the need to
support 4-byte AS numbers without mandating an absolute final adoption of
4-byte AS numbers. 2.
Summary of current problem ------------------------------ The
current policy has three critical dates with associated policy changes for the
assignment of 4-byte AS numbers as documented in APNIC-094-v003, "Policies
for Autonomous System number management in the Asia Pacific region [1]: 1
January 2007 APNIC assigns two-byte AS numbers by default.
APNIC assigns four-byte AS numbers on request. 1
January 2009 APNIC assigns four-byte AS numbers by default.
APNIC assigns two-byte AS numbers on request. 1
January 2010 APNIC ceases to make any distinction between two- and
four-byte AS numbers.
APNIC assigns from an undifferentiated four-byte AS
number pool. As
the policy currently stands today, we have a specific jump from 'must request a
2-byte AS' to 4-byte AS numbers being generally assigned. Currently
LIRs may if they choose, simply continue to request 2-byte AS numbers until 1
January 2010 at which time APNIC will begin assignment of 4-byte AS numbers
from without differentiation, This
places little requirement on the general provider community to support 4-byte
AS numbers or equipment vendors to implement and support 4-byte AS numbers. 3.
Situation in other RIRs --------------------------- The
other RIRs assign 4-byte ASNs in the same way as APNIC. If
successful, it is expected that this policy will be presented to the other RIRs
for adoption. 4.
Details of the proposal --------------------------- 4.1
This proposal seeks to create an intermediary stage where LIRs will
be assigned a 4-byte AS number by default unless it is unsuitable.
An LIR requesting a 2-byte AS number would need to demonstrate
that one (or more) of their peers or transit providers are
unable or unwilling to support a 4-byte AS number. 4.2
An LIR can demonstrate the need for a 2-byte AS number by
submitting supporting documentation such as an email or trouble
ticket stating that that the peer or provider is unable or unwilling
to accept a 4-byte AS number. 4.3
The intermediary stage would commence 1 July 2009.
The new timeline would be:
1 January 2007 APNIC assigns two-byte AS numbers by default
APNIC assigns four-byte AS numbers on request.
1 January 2009 APNIC assigns four-byte AS numbers by default.
APNIC assigns two-byte AS numbers on request.
1 July 2009 APNIC assigns four-byte AS numbers by
default.
APNIC assigns two-byte AS numbers if a four-byte
AS number is demonstrated to be unsuitable
1 January 2010 APNIC ceases to make any distinction between two-
and four-byte AS numbers.
APNIC assigns from an undifferentiated four-byte
AS number pool. 5.
Advantages and disadvantages of the proposal ------------------------------------------------ 5.1
Advantages
- The greater awareness and the earlier delegation of 4-byte AS
numbers is expected to create greater demand on Service Providers to
support 4-byte AS numbers.
- More 4-byte AS numbers will be seen in routing tables.
- Makes more service providers aware of their requirement to support
4-byte AS numbers earlier.
- The extent of people unwilling to support 4-byte AS numbers will be
known and documented. This will provide feedback as to the state of
deployment and readiness to begin general assignments.
- Provides more pressure to vendors and Service Providers to
implement 4-byte code.
- Will encourage Service Providers to request 4-byte code from their
vendors, and provides more pressure to equipment vendors and
Service Providers alike.
- Increase the chance of an orderly transistion when 4-byte AS
numbers are delegate as part of the general pool.
- Creates greater awareness of the need to support 4-byte AS numbers
as more parties become in involved in the application for a 2-byte
AS number. 5.2
Disadvantages
- Could create greater administrative overhead on APNIC staff. 6.
Effect on APNIC members --------------------------- The
proposal impacts all APNIC members. 7.
Effect on NIRs ------------------ The
proposal has no direct impact on NIRs, but impacts members of NIRs in the same
way it impacts APNIC members. 8.
References ------------- [1]
Policies for Autonomous System number management in the Asia Pacific
region
http://www.apnic.net/policy/asn-policy.html _______________________________________________ Sig-policy-chair
mailing list Sig-policy-chair at apnic dot net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy-chair
|