Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99

To: Xing Li <xing at cernet dot edu dot cn>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99
From: Dean Pemberton <dean at deanpemberton dot com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:49:23 +1200
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <500E6893.4090800 at cernet dot edu dot cn>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAP2gc-7gersiJTN6fdMUgdUkU1VhStDcx7P=zF=R6oaUq82oPA@mail.gmail.com> <006701cd6650$ff657b30$266df1da@laptop4j> <CAK5YLgfTywgbqg+uqiaiPn0XLBj9fMEQGA=UNnZwUVAJ5MH6cQ@mail.gmail.com> <EE1D6CA1-1B93-45D8-B429-DF67C2A0AF2E@gmail.com> <500CFC66.9010402@apnic.net> <500E6893.4090800@cernet.edu.cn>

In light if that is prop-99 still necessary?

Regards

Dean

On Tuesday, July 24, 2012, Xing Li wrote:

This is exactly the proposal 99 trying to achieve. xing