Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99

To: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99
From: Naresh Ajwani <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:07:18 +0530
Cc: Ren-Hung Hwang <rhhwang at gmail dot com>, SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <CAK5YLgfTywgbqg+uqiaiPn0XLBj9fMEQGA=UNnZwUVAJ5MH6cQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAP2gc-7gersiJTN6fdMUgdUkU1VhStDcx7P=zF=R6oaUq82oPA@mail.gmail.com> <006701cd6650$ff657b30$266df1da@laptop4j> <CAK5YLgfTywgbqg+uqiaiPn0XLBj9fMEQGA=UNnZwUVAJ5MH6cQ@mail.gmail.com>

And for the corner cases Sanjaya's suggestion is fine.

Sorry Aftab, I have missed out this suggestion, wud u mind sharing the same please?

Regards & best wishes,

Naresh Ajwani

On 20-Jul-2012, at 3:52 PM, Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com> wrote:

Hi Terence,

In the above example, sparse allocation tries to ensure the 2*/32 are contiguous,

but prop-099 tries to ensure the 2*/34 are contiguous.

I believe thats not the case because lets say if initially they got 2001:db8::/32 and they allocated /34 each for 4 pops
e.g.
2001:db8::/34
2001:db8:4000::/34
2001:db8:8000::/34
2001:db8:c000::/34

right?

Now for the subsequent allocation the prefix they will get can't make 2*/34 contiguous. So any POP is growing than they either have to renumber or use 2 discontiguous /34. Correct me if I misinterpret.

Nevertheless, I don't support this proposal. And for the corner cases Sanjaya's suggestion is fine.

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui

Date Prev

Date Next

Thread Prev

Thread Next

Date Index

Thread Index

Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99

Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99

Previous by thread: Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99

Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99

Index(es):

Date

Thread