Sanjaya ??:
Hi Naresh & all,My suggestion is to allow APNIC hostmasters delegate multiple prefixes (disaggregated ranges) to very large networks based on the following statement in section 5.3.3 Subsequent Allocation Size:"Where possible, except where separate disaggregated ranges are requested for multiple discreet networks, the allocation will be made from an adjacent address block, meaning that its existing allocation is extended by one bit to the left."Of course, the APNIC hostmasters will evaluate the requests carefully and consider global routing table size impact before making any such delegation.If this suggestion is accepted then the problem stated in prop-099 could be solved, without any policy change.
This is exactly the proposal 99 trying to achieve. xing
Cheers, Sanjaya On 21/07/2012 2:37 PM, Naresh Ajwani wrote:And for the corner cases Sanjaya's suggestion is fine.Sorry Aftab, I have missed out this suggestion, wud u mind sharing the same please? Regards & best wishes, Naresh Ajwani* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy