Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal

To: David Conrad <drc at virtualized dot org>, Dean Pemberton <dean at deanpemberton dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <marty at akamai dot com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:10:12 -0400
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <B6604DEB-E67A-4192-ADCC-AF5882E29A26 at virtualized dot org>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: "Hannigan, Martin" <marty@akamai.com>
Thread-index: Ac1dXC9zuP9UM4sBQ7iHVO6tcTRM4AMUjyAc
Thread-topic: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.13.0.120411



On 7/8/12 6:51 PM, "David Conrad" <drc at virtualized dot org> wrote:

> On Jul 8, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Dean Pemberton wrote:

[ clip ]


> - I believe most folks trying to do business are looking for consistency of
> policy/process.  


+1


Best,

-M<