Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructureassign
On 8/20/10 5:01 AM, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> I was assuming that there will be a specific /8 block reserved for the
> final /8 policy, so 18.104.22.168/16 will remain untouched.
> (but I could be wrong and see this part is ambigous)
I think that would be a topic of discussion at the next meeting. The
secretariat would possibly have studied this too. Any comments from the
>> Given the recent discussion, I think it may be helpful for me to
> consolidate certain ambiguous points and
>> let the secretariat clarify.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----