Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructureassign
Hash: SHA1
On 8/20/10 5:01 AM, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> I was assuming that there will be a specific /8 block reserved for the
> final /8 policy, so 203.119.0.0/16 will remain untouched.
>
> (but I could be wrong and see this part is ambigous)
I think that would be a topic of discussion at the next meeting. The
secretariat would possibly have studied this too. Any comments from the
secretariat ?
>
>> Given the recent discussion, I think it may be helpful for me to
> consolidate certain ambiguous points and
>> let the secretariat clarify.
I agree.
- -gaurab
- --
http://www.gaurab.org.np/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkxuAAMACgkQSo7fU26F3X196ACfbZlO6O3zSLTPshHBQwhuLQQr
dUEAoK0wqVTeiIXJkAp61bThSPXBUReY
=qxVR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----