Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocati

To: Jonny Martin <jonny at jonnynet dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria
From: Scott Leibrand <sleibrand at internap dot com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:07:10 -0800
Cc: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <B883AB22-CFC2-49CE-8CA2-1D1F114EC5D2 at jonnynet dot net>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4799E61F.8060300@psg.com> <B883AB22-CFC2-49CE-8CA2-1D1F114EC5D2@jonnynet.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Jonny Martin wrote:

Are there any members out there who have not been able to obtain v6space under the current policy? If there is demonstrably a realproblem here then I am happy to change my view on this policy.Otherwise I'm going to expend my efforts on actual problems.

In the ARIN region, when considering a similar proposal we asked ARIN

staff how many requests had been denied because they didn't have a plan

for 200 customers. I believe the answer was 1.

I wouldn't oppose this policy, but it might be useful for APNIC staff to

report on how many applicants have been turned down under the current

policy for not meeting the requirement to have a plan for 200 customers.


-Scott