Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocati

To: Jonny Martin <jonny at jonnynet dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:08:47 +0900
Cc: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <B883AB22-CFC2-49CE-8CA2-1D1F114EC5D2 at jonnynet dot net>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4799E61F.8060300@psg.com> <B883AB22-CFC2-49CE-8CA2-1D1F114EC5D2@jonnynet.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

I don't see this proposal directly promoting the *deployment* of v6.

the obstacles to v6 deployment are not lack PI space and the concurrent

lack of ability to pollute the routing table. they are the difficulty of

actually deploying and the lack of user demand.


randy