On 26/01/2008, at 2:37 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
The proposal 'Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria' hasbeen sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented during the Policy SIG sessions at APNIC 25 in Taipei, Taiwan, 25-29 February 2008.The proposal's history can be found at: http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-057-v001.html
Now I wholeheartedly support the deployment of v6, however currently I fail to see the actual requirement for this proposal. Current wording is purely for a *plan* for 200 v6 customers. I have plans for a lot of things. Reality is often quite different to those plans.
I don't see this proposal directly promoting the *deployment* of v6. If members feel that the biggest obstacle in the way to deploying - in any capacity - v6 was justifying an initial allocation, then how are they going to get on when it comes to actually implementing it.
Are there any members out there who have not been able to obtain v6 space under the current policy? If there is demonstrably a real problem here then I am happy to change my view on this policy. Otherwise I'm going to expend my efforts on actual problems.
Cheers, Jonny.