Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocati
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jonny Martin wrote:
|
| I don't see this proposal directly promoting the *deployment* of v6.
| If members feel that the biggest obstacle in the way to deploying -
| in any capacity - v6 was justifying an initial allocation, then how
| are they going to get on when it comes to actually implementing it.
|
| Are there any members out there who have not been able to obtain v6
| space under the current policy? If there is demonstrably a real
| problem here then I am happy to change my view on this policy.
| Otherwise I'm going to expend my efforts on actual problems.
i tend to think that given the variety in the understanding of the
English language in the region, clarifying the wordings to make it
obvious is good - which the policy proposal intends to do.
thanks
~ -gaurab
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHml9WSo7fU26F3X0RAsPOAKC/k42n38N+ZFUiFOfAvk1debkZtACg/fwC
MsjGkAi+irYJqVPbhDvrRZQ=
=O6p7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----