Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to suppor

To: David Conrad <drc at virtualized dot org>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to support DNS Infrastructure
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <marty at akamai dot com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:49:59 -0500
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:received:received:received:from:to:cc:date:subject: thread-topic:thread-index:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=1XNoP8LTapWY+P3Y0DNyE6agCCbNQhD45mBlxqygzHw=; b=UMkkXh+f7FiX1QrfmUm4GqBsIlPmEGulKSUuTPBkfILjL+MVEyU1DrXaC2Nae4i+2fu2kgdZ9ivvr etar5udbgUYU5DMJ7IcTM0qv/zBRyMSW7KpKHa/B1OlCcEeOHtpHf4TmBB8wvoUoX4taGiB3Byal86 gzhaNP6DSW9AuIGE=
In-reply-to: <60E5E0E3-427A-4559-AF5C-6BEBAA89F6E5 at virtualized dot org>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_OpDgBHuAiaXD1AfS3F+UWnfcePXC3yCrnCHHZYKiDPmDg@mail.gmail.com> <m2txcrpmat.wl%randy@psg.com> <000BDAA2-6AC5-4D6C-9F64-83380232547F@akamai.com> <60E5E0E3-427A-4559-AF5C-6BEBAA89F6E5@virtualized.org>
Thread-index: Ac8bZq0qNTRZAbCDSJiiwIYinvrfGg==
Thread-topic: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to support DNS Infrastructure

On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:19 AM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized dot org> wrote:

> On Jan 26, 2014, at 8:26 PM, Hannigan, Martin <marty at akamai dot com> wrote:
>> That and isn't the IETF the right venue to carve out a specific from a /8? This is in effect global policy, isn't it?
> 
> I suppose APNIC could throw it back to IANA (maybe? not sure how an RIR can throw a /24 back to IANA -- perhaps that needs a global policy too?) who could, after a couple of years after a global policy is established, put that prefix into the IPv4 special registry.
> 
> However, in the meantime, is there a problem with APNIC declaring it "anycast to support DNS infrastructure" now?

Not that I can tell. 

Best,

-M<