Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to suppor

To: Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org>, SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to support DNS Infrastructure
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <marty at akamai dot com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:26:47 -0500
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:received:received:received:from:to:date:subject: thread-topic:thread-index:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=umGn8I6ulVlt89uS8zzKxvdoQo6ns75Ii4TlBKW4OEs=; b=UHe159kmlWgyBneVEjBO7DHTQv5BIL66uzTQxaiaEp0mes0QP8g4DeVX1Pe0qQ2+f+DGRLbM1v3s4 sIU9j/oTWC8/d7+qMk6LfOlpBjZzMuNLa0fevDUHSLBSiSpSAn/qp7ODkgy7wYnktqrLwrGMqPC1qa GRaY3qpuBCJ42d8c=
In-reply-to: <m2txcrpmat.wl%randy at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_OpDgBHuAiaXD1AfS3F+UWnfcePXC3yCrnCHHZYKiDPmDg@mail.gmail.com> <m2txcrpmat.wl%randy@psg.com>
Thread-index: Ac8bF/8DH1rxk4GaRCS1iCkQA7y9zA==
Thread-topic: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to support DNS Infrastructure

That and isn't the IETF the right venue to carve out a specific from a /8? This is in effect global policy, isn't it?

On Jan 25, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com> wrote:

> and why won't this leak and make confusion?
> 
> randy
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy