Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99
Regards & best wishes,
Naresh Ajwani
On 28-Jul-2012, at 12:59 PM, Xing Li <xing at cernet dot edu dot cn> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aftab Siddiqui 写道:
>> Hi,
>> [Looking for prop-099 authors]
>>
>> Hi Naresh & all,
>>
>> My suggestion is to allow APNIC hostmasters delegate multiple prefixes
>> (disaggregated ranges) to very large networks based on the following
>> statement in section 5.3.3 Subsequent Allocation Size:
>>
>> "Where possible, except where separate disaggregated ranges are
>> requested for multiple discreet networks, the allocation will be made
>> from an adjacent address block, meaning that its existing
>> allocation is
>> extended by one bit to the left."
>>
>> Of course, the APNIC hostmasters will evaluate the requests carefully
>> and consider global routing table size impact before making any such
>> delegation.
>>
>> I agree to this but would like to see the comments from the authors.
>
> As one of the authors of proposal 99, I agree to achieve the goal of 99
> without change the current policy. I suggest APNIC clearly documents
> this description and make it openly accessible for the IPv6 address policy.
>
> Best regards,
>
> xing
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Aftab A. Siddiqui
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>
>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy