Hi,
[Looking for prop-099 authors]
Hi Naresh & all,
My suggestion is to allow APNIC hostmasters delegate multiple prefixes
(disaggregated ranges) to very large networks based on the following
statement in section 5.3.3 Subsequent Allocation Size:
"Where possible, except where separate disaggregated ranges are
requested for multiple discreet networks, the allocation will be made
from an adjacent address block, meaning that its existing
allocation is
extended by one bit to the left."
Of course, the APNIC hostmasters will evaluate the requests carefully
and consider global routing table size impact before making any such
delegation.
I agree to this but would like to see the comments from the authors.