Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
i can probably do the wording on that amendment.
> The biggest reluctance is to close the door on IPv6 policy so soon in
> the deployment [1].
not seeing footnote.
> I think that there might be some middle ground whereby the PDP process
> only started up when a proposal was presented, rather than as a matter
> of course. That way the door was always open, but didn't mean that
> there had to be a party every 6 months if there was nothing to say.
propose text?
randy