Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal

To: Dean Pemberton <dean at deanpemberton dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:54:12 +0900
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <CACfPNNR8xhkGzDYiJ61DMRSz05iF6aUKFQiposgyoOEJouGwVA@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_Oq-JomRRfk=G1+eVYVBHVq6uEAjvEgrw1TZ6PXO5oMmJA@mail.gmail.com> <AC9C4813-DB8C-48FF-B8B4-B9552EE04AD4@delong.com> <CACfPNNQNJxvSK3cqW=fT_rDHCT5ZBPGBFF0rsCFA3vwYoh9rrw@mail.gmail.com> <CACfPNNSJkB-igBZZN0a0i-48ZfN_p-G-aqx4UAwTKRBR7zxmAg@mail.gmail.com> <m2vchueyw9.wl%randy@psg.com> <CACfPNNR8xhkGzDYiJ61DMRSz05iF6aUKFQiposgyoOEJouGwVA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)


i can probably do the wording on that amendment.

> The biggest reluctance is to close the door on IPv6 policy so soon in
> the deployment [1].

not seeing footnote.

> I think that there might be some middle ground whereby the PDP process
> only started up when a proposal was presented, rather than as a matter
> of course.  That way the door was always open, but didn't mean that
> there had to be a party every 6 months if there was nothing to say.

propose text?

randy