Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
I'm not fully convinced that v6 is fully baked (e.g. Prop-101) yet, and as more operators/end sites get on the bandwagon there's likely to be other interesting hiccups that may need to be addressed. A mechanism probably should remain to allow for this, whether it is triggered on-demand or through the AMM/EC.
So I guess I am gently supportive of the intent, and do think that there probably needs to be slightly less emphasis on the policy SIG overall. Although it is my favorite part of every APNIC meeting....
aj
On 11/07/2012, at 6:47 PM, Dean Pemberton <dean at deanpemberton dot com> wrote:
> You've got my support on the ice cream. =)
>
> The biggest reluctance is to close the door on IPv6 policy so soon in
> the deployment [1].
>
> I think that there might be some middle ground whereby the PDP process
> only started up when a proposal was presented, rather than as a matter
> of course. That way the door was always open, but didn't mean that
> there had to be a party every 6 months if there was nothing to say.
>
> Regards,
> Dean
>
>
>
> [1] yes I realise how long the RFCs have been around. yes I realise
> how long people SHOULD have been doing this.
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com> wrote:
>>> Randy, would you as the proposer be open to making amendments to this
>>> proposal? Or would you rather that it stand as currently written?
>>
>> in principle, sure. but would depend on the amendments, of course.
>> e.g. one to serve coffee ice cream at all meetings would be most
>> welcome. (we really should try to keep a sense of humor)
>>
>> but beware of the union standard proposal effect. nw said something
>> like everyone thinks pascal is almost perfect, and wants to change only
>> one thing. the problem is that everyone has a different thing.
>>
>> randy
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dean
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy