Re: [sig-policy] prop-086-v003: Global Policy for IPv4 Allocations by th
If the RIR's can not come to agrement, would the following be a possbile
approach:
- IANA creates reclaimatin pool
- LIR go to IANA directly for v4 address request from the reclaimation pool
- IANA can staff or outsource (to one of the RIR for instance) to field those
request
- public reporting of the reclaimation pool is required
So basically RIR's give up the responsibility managing v4 outside the last /8,
and IANA takes over.
Yi Chu
Sprint
----- Original Message ----
From: Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org>
To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Sent: Sun, February 20, 2011 5:40:49 AM
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-086-v003: Global Policy for IPv4 Allocations by
the IANA Post, Exhaustion
On 20/02/11 06:15 , Chris Grundemann wrote:
> I typically take silence as consent but I think it would be great to
> get some real feedback on this proposal here on the list, pre-meeting.
>
>
Chris,
I'd have thought that prop-097 was a very detailed piece of feedback on
this proposal. I think that prop-097 is a clear rejection of the North
American (ARIN) view.
We meet in these forums to discuss policy that would result in positive
outcomes for as many people in our global community as possible.
Prop-086 seems to benefit the ARIN community at the expense of the rest
of the RIR communities.
We clearly do need to discuss because a fractured view on this won't
help any of us but simply accepting prop-086 doesn't seem to be the best
option.
Let's discuss face to face in Hong Kong and take it back to the lists if
need be.
andy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy