Re: [sig-policy] Fwd: Re: [nznog] Prop 94
> my vision of the smll allocations of the final /8 policy is, as andy
> said, to allow v6-only or dual-stacked end sites to front onto the
> dual-stacked backbones.
So would you envisage us asking for a deployment plan describing how
they would use the /22 to get their v6-only or dual-stacked end sites to
front onto the dual-stacked backbones?
I'd also note that some of those requesting IPv4 space for this might
not need IPv6 space from APNIC. That might be available from their
upstream provider when IPv4 is not.