Re: [sig-policy] prop-063: Reducing timeframe of IPv4 allocations from t
Izumi Okutani said the following on 20/8/08 19:44:
> No strong support for this in JP.
> People did not find this would provide strong benefits in exchange to
> additional workload it would put on APNIC/NIRs/LIRs.
Do you have any estimation what the additional workload on JPNIC would
be, out of interest. It's one thing asserting "there will be more", but
I'd be really interested to know how much more.
The reason I ask is that, I can see there will be twice the workload if
each member came back to APNIC/NIRs exactly once every year. But do they
come back more frequently than this, or less frequently? Do they ask for
a full year ahead, or shorter time frame.
> Perhaps, if there are some data on how much chance for requests it would
> increase for LIRs in general, then, may be the opinions will change.
Heh, do you have any data from JPNIC's experience?