Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6
>>> popular in JP.
>> wow! why. the goal was simple, to separate the prefix length
>> by which HD is measured from actual assignment size. that is
>> all. why could someone think this bad? i am very confused.
> I'm getting confused here too :-).
> I assumed this was the same proposal as what had been proposed at the
> ARIN last meeting in Montreal. Doesn't it imply to make assignments on
> justifiable basis by one bit?
s/imply/allow without affecting how hd is calculated/
randy