Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6
>> What is the extent of decisions left upto LIRs over the size of an
>> assignment? I recall there were some discussions over creating
>> guidelines(or recommendations) for LIRs in the ARIN region, and
>> wondering how it will apply in our region.
>>
>> This would probably affect people's position over the proposal, so I
>> hope someone (Geoff or Randy?) could help me clarify this point.
>
> it would still be on an as justified basis. this is just removes
> the dependency of HD calc from actual allocation size.
Thanks Randy. It makes sense that the HD ratio calculation should be
independent from the assignment size, but I'm not too sure what you mean
by justified basis.
Is it left upto LIRs to assign any size they believe is adequate(either
operationally or service wise), or are they expected to justify their
assignments in some way?
One more question I have is whether this proposal removes the currently
/48 boundary for requiring second opinion requests. It made sense when
the standard assignment size was /48, but how would this apply in this
proposal?
izumi