Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6
>> Thanks Randy. It makes sense that the HD ratio calculation should
>> be independent from the assignment size, but I'm not too sure
>> what you mean by justified basis.
>
> that the lir would assign what is needed/justifiable. i.e. if the
> customer can justify a /42 they should assign a /42.
okay, so I suppose it would be similar to IPv4?
As you are probably aware, I have a feeling that this idea won't be so
popular in JP. I'll introduce it in our policy meeting this Friday and
share the feedbacks here.
>> One more question I have is whether this proposal removes the
>> currently /48 boundary for requiring second opinion requests.
>
> oops! we are entering territory i do not know well. perhaps
> geoff or someone else should speak.
:-) yes, someone had also pointed out to me that there are no second
opinion requests in ARIN.
In AP, LIRs are required to submit a second opinion request to APNIC
hostmaster if they make assignments shorter than /48.
It may sound a little operational to discuss it here, but I'm pretty
sure that I'd get these questions from LIRs in JP, so it would help if
someone could answer this point for me.
Thanks,
izumi