[sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6p
>
> Chanki Park said the following on 24/11/05 11:34:
> >
> > What should be done if there were disagreement with chair's decision
> > before making decision and after the announcement.
> > What process should we take? Is there a process for this?
> >
> > That's why I called this issue as a "procedural matter."
>
> Ah, the issue is now apparent. Despite the fact that there was
> sufficient disquiet at the APNIC meeting about the proposal passed by
> the NIR SIG, you want it to proceed. And then you said
> earlier that the
> NIRs don't work for their own self interest - sort of looks as though
> KRNIC/NIDA is, doesn't it? If you were interested in the good of the
> Internet community in the entire region, you'd respect other people's
> point of view and opinions, rather than trying to ram your own opinion
> down everyone else's throats.
>
> APNIC members take note, KRNIC clearly have another agenda here.
>
My only agenda is correcting a mistake.
And if we need, examine(or elaborate) our policy development process.
Regards,
Chanki
> > I am claiming that the chair and co-chair made WRONG decision.
>
> The chair and co-chair had to make a decision given the feeling in the
> room. As your only interest in this proposal is to reduce the fees you
> pay to APNIC, clearly you would disagree with their decision.
> That's life.
>
> If you had respect for the chair and co-chair, and you had respect for
> the rest of the Internet community in the region, you'd accept their
> decision, and spend your time analysing the discussions and
> work out how
> to make the proposal more acceptable to the entire community.
>
> Izumi-san has proposed establishing a working group to look
> at this. I'm
> not sure it needs to be that formal, as in my view the proposal only
> needs the minor modification to have no financial impact on
> APNIC for it
> to be proposed and accepted at the next Member Meeting. But
> if a working
> group is required, hopefully it can start work asap. As I said before,
> I'm happy to help, if invited to join...
>
> philip
> --
>