[sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6p
> My only agenda is correcting a mistake.
And what mistake may that be? That KRNIC/NIDA can't get its own way all
While KRNIC/NIDA may dictate to its membership what does and doesn't
happen in Korea, this is not what happens in the rest of the Internet.
Did you consult with your membership in an open forum about all the
APNIC policy proposals which were proposed in Hanoi? Not that I can find
any evidence of, that's for sure.
I don't recall anyone from KRNIC standing up at the APNIC meeting and
saying "we discussed this with our membership, and X% thought it was a
great idea, and Y% thought is was bad". I recall one NIR that gave this
sort of input, and they are to be congratulated for encouraging open
dialogue within the community.
So KRNIC/NIDA clearly makes decisions on what is good and bad for its
membership. Same way as you clearly now want to make decisions on what
is good and bad for the APNIC membership.
> And if we need, examine(or elaborate) our policy development process.
Ah yes, the new policy which says that everything that KRNIC wants is
automatically approved regardless of people's opinions? Mmmm, I can see
that one being very popular (not!).