RE: [sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Re:Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIP
> Great, how do the NIRs feel about this?
Let's correct a mistake first.
Then let's discuss what to do.
> Would you like to work closely on the proposal by setting up a working
> group? If yes, we can call for the volunteers publicly from the whole
> Philip Smith wrote:
> > Hi Izumi-san,
> > Izumi Okutani said the following on 24/11/05 12:30:
> >>As Philip has mentioned, we can still continue discussions over this
> >>proposal and work on it. We have to make a decision over
> this particular
> >>proposal at some point whether or not we postpone the
> decision, and I
> >>felt that more discussions are needed which was why I declared
> >>This however doesn't mean it is the end of the proposal - we can
> >>continue discussions on this topic.
> > I'd be delighted to. I fully understand the original
> motivation of the
> > proposal, but the proposed solution had a financial impact
> on APNIC. A
> > solution which has no financial impact on APNIC would set a better
> > precedent, otherwise we could end up with a situation which Randy
> > described earlier.
> >>Perhaps, we can set up a working group to work on this?
> > That's a good idea, I'd be happy to participate if you'd
> find that at
> > all useful.
> > philip
> > --
> sig-nir mailing list
> sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net