Hello Masato,I think you mean (one opposition for prop-114 and one support for prop-115) Not 104 and 105.AdamOn 14/09/2015 18:28, "sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net on behalf of Masato Yamanishi" <sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net on behalf of myamanis at gmail dot com> wrote:Dear Colleagues, While now I'm seeing a lot of comments on the list and it is good thing,let me ask you to state these comments before asking consensus in OPM.While I have announced three proposal discussed in Jakarta, only two comments(one opposition for prop-104 and one support for prop-105) were made on the list.http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/archive/2015/08/Even in the meeting, the discussion was not so active compared to previous meetings.Without enough comments and discussions before asking consensus, authors cannotimprove their proposals in timely manner. Also, few discussion makes difficult for Chairsto gauging community's opinion. As a result, proposals may need more meetings toreach consensus or fail. Certainly, "no interest" is one of possible opinions,but it is not easy to distinguish them from "not yet been interested" or "just hesitate".IMO, current situation is not bottom-up discussion and rather it looks like a votingfor the agenda which were provided by somebody.So, please express your opinion and have productive discussion before asking consensusin Auckland and future meetings.Thank you for your understanding.Regards,Masato YamanishiAPNIC Policy SIG Chair Date PrevDate NextThread PrevThread NextDate IndexThread Index Date PrevDate NextThread PrevThread NextDate IndexThread Index Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy] Discussion before vs after asking consensus Previous by Thread: Re: [sig-policy] Discussion before vs after asking consensus Index(es): Date Thread
Dear Colleagues, While now I'm seeing a lot of comments on the list and it is good thing,let me ask you to state these comments before asking consensus in OPM.While I have announced three proposal discussed in Jakarta, only two comments(one opposition for prop-104 and one support for prop-105) were made on the list.http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/archive/2015/08/Even in the meeting, the discussion was not so active compared to previous meetings.Without enough comments and discussions before asking consensus, authors cannotimprove their proposals in timely manner. Also, few discussion makes difficult for Chairsto gauging community's opinion. As a result, proposals may need more meetings toreach consensus or fail. Certainly, "no interest" is one of possible opinions,but it is not easy to distinguish them from "not yet been interested" or "just hesitate".IMO, current situation is not bottom-up discussion and rather it looks like a votingfor the agenda which were provided by somebody.So, please express your opinion and have productive discussion before asking consensusin Auckland and future meetings.Thank you for your understanding.Regards,Masato YamanishiAPNIC Policy SIG Chair