Re: [sig-policy] Discussion before vs after asking consensus

To: Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com>, "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Discussion before vs after asking consensus
From: Adam Gosling <adam at apnic dot net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:46:03 +0000
Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <CALcH-8kPdR8jU7TRYhnJ=X6wE7Pt5JgDZ+22RxPCQHeh2c+bbQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALcH-8kPdR8jU7TRYhnJ=X6wE7Pt5JgDZ+22RxPCQHeh2c+bbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-index: AQHQ7sebLD4BofxFIEirxXmds4tXwZ48wjmA

Hello Masato,

I think you mean (one opposition for prop-114 and one support for prop-115)

Not 104 and 105.

Adam

On 14/09/2015 18:28, "sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net on behalf of Masato Yamanishi" <sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net on behalf of myamanis at gmail dot com> wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

While now I'm seeing a lot of comments on the list and it is good thing,
let me ask you to state these comments before asking consensus in OPM.

While I have announced three proposal discussed in Jakarta, only two comments
(one opposition for prop-104 and one support for prop-105) were made on the list.
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/archive/2015/08/
Even in the meeting, the discussion was not so active compared to previous meetings.

Without enough comments and discussions before asking consensus, authors cannot
improve their proposals in timely manner. Also, few discussion makes difficult for Chairs
to gauging community's opinion. As a result, proposals may need more meetings to
reach consensus or fail. Certainly, "no interest" is one of possible opinions,
but it is not easy to distinguish them from "not yet been interested" or "just hesitate".

IMO, current situation is not bottom-up discussion and rather it looks like a voting
for the agenda which were provided by somebody.

So, please express your opinion and have productive discussion before asking consensus
in Auckland and future meetings.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
Masato Yamanishi
APNIC Policy SIG Chair

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature