Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-114: prop-114: Modification in the
Hash: SHA1
if status is allocated, it is current.
so, just remove the 'previous'
- -gaurab
On 3/6/15 1:09 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> I do agree... I think we will change it to 'current'
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Sanjeev Gupta <sanjeev at dcs1 dot biz
> <mailto:sanjeev at dcs1 dot biz>> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya
> <gaurab at lahai dot com <mailto:gaurab at lahai dot com>> wrote:
>
> "have allocated provider independent address space by APNIC, AND
> intend to multi-home in the future"
>
> the 'previous' term is confusing. kind of implies that it doesn't
> need to be current allocation (so in theory returned/re-claimed
> space users could qualify - though that is not the intention).
>
>
> It is not just confusing, it is explicitly different.
>
> Aftab, Skeeve, is the "previous" use-case intended?
>
> -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> * _______________________________________________ sig-policy
> mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> <mailto:sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
>
>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> * _______________________________________________ sig-policy
> mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
- --
http://www.gaurab.org.np/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAlT4/s4ACgkQSo7fU26F3X182gCg70G0RByisCjt2HXiLFOWHhgb
h10AoKTcPiw9v/wgmlq7EC/4kLdcWPNk
=jWUW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----