Re: [sig-policy] Policy SIG session schedule
nothing in parallel with the Thursday Policy SIG. It meant that the
technical/ops part of the conference finished on Wednesday. APRICOT 2009
was one example - for reference. (And tech/ops people left on Wednesday
night.)
But we reverted to putting regular conference content in parallel with
the Policy SIG following requests and feedback for that.
And yes, if there is clear desire from the Policy SIG to be standalone,
the APRICOT PC will pay very close attention to that desire. :-)
philip
--
Skeeve Stevens wrote on 2/03/2015 12:04 :
> OK... so a year in the future... that should easily be dealt with by
> talking to the Apricot Program Committee... as it is a very reasonable
> and obvious thing to do.
>
> Is it possible for this meeting? Competing event for Policy means there
> will be little reason to entice people to come .
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
> skeeve at v4now dot com <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com> ; www.v4now.com
> <http://www.v4now.com/>
>
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/v4now
> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>
> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ;
> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>
>
> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com
> <mailto:myamanis at gmail dot com>> wrote:
>
> Skeeve,
>
> Unfortunately, I don't think we can change the schedule in this meeting.
> I'm asking about future meetings.
>
> Regards,
> Masato
>
> 2015-03-01 18:46 GMT-08:00 Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at v4now dot com
> <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com>>:
>
> Masato-san,
>
> Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or
> Lightening talks for this event? I would love to go to both.
>
> I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not
> APNIC events.
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
> skeeve at v4now dot com <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com> ; www.v4now.com
> <http://www.v4now.com/>
>
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383
> <tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383> ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/v4now
> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>
> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ;
> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>
>
> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Masato Yamanishi
> <myamanis at gmail dot com <mailto:myamanis at gmail dot com>> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean
> during the ML discussion,
> it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is
> best for Policy SIG.
>
> Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu.
> However, do you think it is a barrier for wider participation?
> (e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?)
>
> Also, which session should not be in parallel with Policy SIG?
> (I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve mentioned)
>
> Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline in
> Fukuoka.
>
> Regards,
> Masato Yamanishi
> APNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting)
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
> policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>