- To: Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com>
- Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Policy SIG session schedule
- From: Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at v4now dot com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:04:22 +0900
- Cc: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
- Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
- In-reply-to: <CALcH-8neWrVC=YQM9F315kSirTAJ3dFQMA_TAtL3UudkBYwC_g at mail dot gmail dot com>
- List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
- List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
OK... so a year in the future... that should easily be dealt with by talking to the Apricot Program Committee... as it is a very reasonable and obvious thing to do.
Is it possible for this meeting? Competing event for Policy means there will be little reason to entice people to come .
...Skeeve
Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker
v4Now - an eintellego Networks service
skeeve at v4now dot com ; www.v4now.com
Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/v4now ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com> wrote:
Skeeve,Unfortunately, I don't think we can change the schedule in this meeting.I'm asking about future meetings.Regards,Masato2015-03-01 18:46 GMT-08:00 Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at v4now dot com>:Masato-san,Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or Lightening talks for this event? I would love to go to both.I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not APNIC events.
...SkeeveSkeeve Stevens - Senior IP Brokerv4Now - an eintellego Networks serviceskeeve at v4now dot com ; www.v4now.comPhone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/v4now ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyersOn Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com> wrote:Dear All,While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean during the ML discussion,it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is best for Policy SIG.Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu.However, do you think it is a barrier for wider participation?(e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?)Also, which session should not be in parallel with Policy SIG?(I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve mentioned)Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline in Fukuoka.Regards,Masato YamanishiAPNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting)
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy