Re: [sig-policy] Consensus Measurement

To: Dean Pemberton <dean at internetnz dot net dot nz>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Consensus Measurement
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 11:22:44 +0300
Cc: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>, Policy SIG Mailing List <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <CAHT1SrF-Av4Stt=6YwdVN6zHdPQ0rH8xSqPjjwrriapgTpmX4Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5374DEBE.8060907@nic.ad.jp> <CF9FE535.90C77%myamanis@japan-telecom.com> <537C031B.3080209@nic.ad.jp> <m2tx8jbrbs.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAHT1SrF-Av4Stt=6YwdVN6zHdPQ0rH8xSqPjjwrriapgTpmX4Q@mail.gmail.com>

> their decision making process, I think that it maybe too tempting a
> fall back for future chairs.

$100 says that we will be voting within five years

this is a bad path

randy