Re: [sig-policy] Consensus Measurement

To: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Consensus Measurement
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:04:23 +0300
Cc: Policy SIG Mailing List <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <537C031B.3080209 at nic dot ad dot jp>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5374DEBE.8060907@nic.ad.jp> <CF9FE535.90C77%myamanis@japan-telecom.com> <537C031B.3080209@nic.ad.jp>

> electric voting.

i strongly agree with this concern.

i suspect that we are a bunch of engineers trying to use technology to
compensate for not being sensitive to our membership/audience.  boys and
their toys, is the american idiom.

randy