Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6 default
Hi Masato-san,
My intention is to modify initial allocation criteria up to /29
for all members (in all blocks).
Yours Sincerely,
--
Tomohiro Fujisaki
From: Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at japan-telecom dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6 default allocation size
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:50:24 -0800
| Fujisaki-san,
|
| Let me clarify one thing.
|
| Do you intend to changing minimum allocation size only for old /23 blocks
| where we reserved /29 for each LIRs, or for all blocks?
|
| Rgs,
| Masato
|
|
|
| On 14/01/27 22:19, "(Tomohiro -INSTALLER- Fujisaki/藤崎 智宏)"
| <fujisaki at syce dot net> wrote:
|
| >
| >Hi,
| >
| >Guangliang, thank you so much for explaining current situation.
| >I was just drafting my reply mail:-)
| >
| >David, what Guangliang mentioned is almost same as my drafted reply
| >mail, with smarter and clearer explanation.
| >
| >Yours Sincerely,
| >--
| >Tomohiro Fujisaki
| >
| >
| >From: Guangliang Pan <gpan at apnic dot net>
| >Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6
| >default allocation size
| >Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:20:30 +0000
| >
| > | Hi David,
| > |
| > | I think that statement refers to early IPv6 allocations from the old
| >/23 blocks. Before APNIC received the /12 allocation from IANA, we use
| >sequence allocation method to make /32 allocations and reserved up to /29
| >for every allocation. That was the practice for all RIRs in the early
| >stage. I believe this policy proposal is trying to address those reserved
| >space.
| > |
| > | APNIC has been using spare allocation method to make IPv6 allocations
| >from the /12 block since we received it from IANA. We don't do
| >reservation in sparse allocation, but in fact every allocation has a room
| >to grow. Current /32 allocations from the /12 block can grow up to /24 at
| >this stage.
| > |
| > | Best regards,
| > |
| > | Guangliang
| > | =========
| > |
| > |
| > | From: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
| >[mailto:sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net] On Behalf Of David Conrad
| > | Sent: Monday, 27 January 2014 11:30 AM
| > | To: SIG policy
| > | Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of
| >IPv6 default allocation size
| > |
| > | However, the space up to /29 is reserved by APNIC secretariat for each
| >/32 allocation.
| > |
| > | I thought the spare allocation method the RIRs agreed to use for IPv6
| >in order to get the /12 from the IANA precluded the need to reserve any
| >address space.
| > |
| > | Does APNIC still reserve address space?
| > |
| > | Thanks,
| > | -drc
| > |
| > |
| >* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
| > *
| >_______________________________________________
| >sig-policy mailing list
| >sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
| >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
|
|
|
|