Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6 default
Let me clarify one thing.
Do you intend to changing minimum allocation size only for old /23 blocks
where we reserved /29 for each LIRs, or for all blocks?
Rgs,
Masato
On 14/01/27 22:19, "(Tomohiro -INSTALLER- Fujisaki/èå æå)"
<fujisaki at syce dot net> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>Guangliang, thank you so much for explaining current situation.
>I was just drafting my reply mail:-)
>
>David, what Guangliang mentioned is almost same as my drafted reply
>mail, with smarter and clearer explanation.
>
>Yours Sincerely,
>--
>Tomohiro Fujisaki
>
>
>From: Guangliang Pan <gpan at apnic dot net>
>Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6
>default allocation size
>Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:20:30 +0000
>
> | Hi David,
> |
> | I think that statement refers to early IPv6 allocations from the old
>/23 blocks. Before APNIC received the /12 allocation from IANA, we use
>sequence allocation method to make /32 allocations and reserved up to /29
>for every allocation. That was the practice for all RIRs in the early
>stage. I believe this policy proposal is trying to address those reserved
>space.
> |
> | APNIC has been using spare allocation method to make IPv6 allocations
>from the /12 block since we received it from IANA. We don't do
>reservation in sparse allocation, but in fact every allocation has a room
>to grow. Current /32 allocations from the /12 block can grow up to /24 at
>this stage.
> |
> | Best regards,
> |
> | Guangliang
> | =========
> |
> |
> | From: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
>[mailto:sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net] On Behalf Of David Conrad
> | Sent: Monday, 27 January 2014 11:30 AM
> | To: SIG policy
> | Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of
>IPv6 default allocation size
> |
> | However, the space up to /29 is reserved by APNIC secretariat for each
>/32 allocation.
> |
> | I thought the spare allocation method the RIRs agreed to use for IPv6
>in order to get the /12 from the IANA precluded the need to reserve any
>address space.
> |
> | Does APNIC still reserve address space?
> |
> | Thanks,
> | -drc
> |
> |
>* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
>_______________________________________________
>sig-policy mailing list
>sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy