Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to suppor

To: Raphael Ho <raphael.ho at ap dot equinix dot com>

Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to support DNS Infrastructure

From: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com>

Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:53:55 +0500

Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>

Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:dkim-signature:mime-version:x-received:received:in-reply-to: references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yng+/ZdzfPOMr5OMo/yzp18+bKeXkKMd8ayzqlOyjmM=; b=uGi5x3gjwCTNCr82bPZiyfYeekTb7sw9k3BU7C2EPQhsmLS6n9WkA9r9AQE+JL6MUT/DBiDxKa/cT d4RdppVXnaobcric2zp/VogiaknwQ0RcGYOR6onLiax4cR2Q317dKUYiuax20ndwl0MhgTvA/Sg9Vl UuNZofM20ASD7Xxo=

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yng+/ZdzfPOMr5OMo/yzp18+bKeXkKMd8ayzqlOyjmM=; b=sQVaPJCYqbBG1i/aTC2rvzhtBwaTF/AnHb+ayZQVnlH7cdPTMQTk5ZK8j7qVtNepnG 5XLcLy7tV0UWS5I0uxwsVYQnBlkUr85xqiV6nIUGUWpbH6E1+jMqiKZWjrY59LKaJa6q mMksvq/+zcBaN38/9QjM3e2uTF1ROn+lka8GGsmitDyQZK9qtmwidSv+9iQRseDPP14k vFNOWAI27oGnSxOkdBu7GYZtTo0OEeWjdSlJJPAet6CiiwksZFUqcjC7+hcnFKbL3OaK 8c+etzv/DwvMc7HXffTsIt+JqNMmjSL66HmFcHpU2yN4RORCIkWyP76ZJwHGhjC/hpFn imVA==

In-reply-to: <CF0C01AF.3E82E%raphael.ho at ap dot equinix dot com>

List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>

List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>

List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>

List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>

List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>

References: <CALS-_OpDgBHuAiaXD1AfS3F+UWnfcePXC3yCrnCHHZYKiDPmDg@mail.gmail.com> <m2txcrpmat.wl%randy@psg.com> <000BDAA2-6AC5-4D6C-9F64-83380232547F@akamai.com> <CF0C01AF.3E82E%raphael.ho@ap.equinix.com>

Hi Raphael,

> I think as long as nobody is announcing this out to the general Internet,

There is a reason why we have bogus prefix announcements for years. So, be ready for some loud noise.

>³Any service with local-only significance within the autonomous system², and not limit

>the use? I can see some other interesting uses that would not require
>global routability, but need slightly more flexibility/reachability than
>the usual RFC1918 space.

Yes, I agree and support this view, the scope should be global.

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Raphael Ho <raphael.ho at ap dot equinix dot com> wrote:

I think as long as nobody is announcing this out to the general Internet,
this is an interesting proposal. If the prefix is allowed out on the
public Internet uncontrolled then I have a problem with potential DNS
hijacking and other issues (and I agree with Mr Hannigan that¹s where IETF
needs to come in)

Assuming that the members agree that the prefix would not be internet
reachable, do we want expand the scope of the proposal to ³Any service
with local-only significance within the autonomous system², and not limit
the use? I can see some other interesting uses that would not require
global routability, but need slightly more flexibility/reachability than
the usual RFC1918 space.

On 27/1/14 12:26 pm, "Hannigan, Martin" <marty at akamai dot com> wrote:

>
>
>That and isn't the IETF the right venue to carve out a specific from a
>/8? This is in effect global policy, isn't it?
>
>
>On Jan 25, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com> wrote:
>
>> and why won't this leak and make confusion?
>>
>> randy
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>> *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
>* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
>_______________________________________________
>sig-policy mailing list
>sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy