Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to suppor

To: Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at eintellegonetworks dot com>

Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to support DNS Infrastructure

From: Jahangir Hossain <jrjahangir at gmail dot com>

Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:04:46 +0600

Cc: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, "sig-policy at apnic dot net SIG List" <sig-policy at apnic dot net>

Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:dkim-signature:mime-version:x-received:received:in-reply-to: references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=leuq4d/WR/dzpZEALuqsjAaz2EE5B5erUvOCawa0CW8=; b=Hzct8UQ4a7DhJHMOE/k7cm6vLPkagh1hnHDtZLNbLCUAmb6up4ZNXnQX7i6Mu6bJulICF7Prdaemn sxKR0/l1zFklXnhTjptl8r7CCd9eRym1Mvaw+EWy0zWOIZ8UvPjTSsl5NlryeppumM1WnNrLfmWx0j iKWl5NfHBhbm8Er0=

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=leuq4d/WR/dzpZEALuqsjAaz2EE5B5erUvOCawa0CW8=; b=Su8cXUXv0j6yraYkYsdYNTyKGBg1PLcOc3w2MHQE0w6MmmA/9XoYuIdgAN7E971Fo9 omNWpqRfsKZvb5UPI5ZtSaycpCi1NIVxS4/RiNf6Qf0ATKpexs9XgUCOJpVrrli4icdH rEP+L+QoC8g5QNMe6+JzHawpcVoCmwtE33HviTh/5uv2M8vOoPUdb5f5cXEUgoS2k9TB RoefF2E/zUzp1Q85xByMJWrhAntOqkF0iN3zjQbRnLWIjq+5ryanPGuSrPzGw4rALBI0 fna9lSDfe7P1lX85dX/Bl551CgAqVbJ80haiB8HTKsVzuj+NgZqar/+67MpykeE3Eza3 Z5yQ==

In-reply-to: <CAEUfUGPVN18AMhet=kd-4krtcYoV+=Eaz+UfU5EBt04gN=_vUA@mail.gmail.com>

List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>

List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>

List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>

List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>

List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>

References: <CALS-_OpDgBHuAiaXD1AfS3F+UWnfcePXC3yCrnCHHZYKiDPmDg@mail.gmail.com> <m2txcrpmat.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAK5YLgfx=Jn4X+Ge+UOjPx6iSRbS4=vsfrEVNggcK7=7CpUFeg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEUfUGPVN18AMhet=kd-4krtcYoV+=Eaz+UfU5EBt04gN=_vUA@mail.gmail.com>

Is it not possible to minimize this unsolicited incoming traffic ? if not then agree on Skeeve 1+

Regards // Jahangir

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at eintellegonetworks dot com> wrote:

Given Geoff makes the bogon report and he is the proposer, I am pretty sure he will deal with that.

On 26/01/2014 6:44 PM, "Aftab Siddiqui" <aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com> wrote:

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com> wrote:
and why won't this leak and make confusion?

randy

So, that means another prefix we will see in the possible bogus announcement in the CIDR-report?

* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy