Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to suppor

To: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to support DNS Infrastructure
From: Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at eintellegonetworks dot com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:02:02 +1100
Cc: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, "sig-policy at apnic dot net SIG List" <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:x-google-dkim-signature:x-gm-message-state:mime-version: x-received:received:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject: from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZseGcvqvkEmjuTV1DBeknBqudWvb1xDFj8WTWQuWGBQ=; b=nR5/w/NYA8Xqdvic5l0iIKJyTicqPyGSnUO582pieFLomu6NtSn2+P54DVFo8v8RY11Qrca8oZkY8 1Q3qmaP+qAsJZWooClEKtMGwefmls/PLZ0gtMTeh1KfintCsgo2o8flFKau46ADzblMuKfdc5I59Wv 7yoD5V5Lzay3ojk4=
In-reply-to: <CAK5YLgfx=Jn4X+Ge+UOjPx6iSRbS4=vsfrEVNggcK7=7CpUFeg at mail dot gmail dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_OpDgBHuAiaXD1AfS3F+UWnfcePXC3yCrnCHHZYKiDPmDg@mail.gmail.com> <m2txcrpmat.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAK5YLgfx=Jn4X+Ge+UOjPx6iSRbS4=vsfrEVNggcK7=7CpUFeg@mail.gmail.com>

Given Geoff makes the bogon report and he is the proposer, I am pretty sure he will deal with that.

On 26/01/2014 6:44 PM, "Aftab Siddiqui" <aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com> wrote:

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com> wrote:
and why won't this leak and make confusion?

randy

So, that means another prefix we will see in the possible bogus announcement in the CIDR-report?

* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy