Re: [sig-policy] prop-104-v001: Clarifying demonstrated needs requiremen

To: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-104-v001: Clarifying demonstrated needs requirement in IPv4 transfer policy
From: Dean Pemberton <dean at deanpemberton dot com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:55:35 +1200
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <m2txvmjtol.wl%randy at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_Ooo5CFcuZQLVrdkchcsihcEAnAtgpdoG8QfVvpTgNBfQA@mail.gmail.com> <CALS-_OpkE3d7d32mQRvrQuzwO+Vm6hSsSt7FA2k3peE81yrRxg@mail.gmail.com> <CACfPNNScoNEs1H8HghFRhpZg1pbLhC+KgoW54Cm2Dvsuqt_FmA@mail.gmail.com> <m2txvmjtol.wl%randy@psg.com>

demonstrated problem is here.
Once I can understand that, I'm in a better position to decide what I
think about the proposed solution.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com> wrote:
>
> if i understand yesterday's presentation, it is to match (for some
> unstated reason), arin's justification window.
>
> i find this strange.  are we going to adjust to also match some others'
> windows?  are were going to have a global policy on the window?  if we
> need to coordinate all parameters globally, why do we need rirs?
>
> randy



-- 
Regards,

Dean