Re: [sig-policy] prop-104-v001: Clarifying demonstrated needs requiremen

To: Dean Pemberton <dean at deanpemberton dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-104-v001: Clarifying demonstrated needs requirement in IPv4 transfer policy
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:52:42 +0700
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <CACfPNNScoNEs1H8HghFRhpZg1pbLhC+KgoW54Cm2Dvsuqt_FmA@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_Ooo5CFcuZQLVrdkchcsihcEAnAtgpdoG8QfVvpTgNBfQA@mail.gmail.com> <CALS-_OpkE3d7d32mQRvrQuzwO+Vm6hSsSt7FA2k3peE81yrRxg@mail.gmail.com> <CACfPNNScoNEs1H8HghFRhpZg1pbLhC+KgoW54Cm2Dvsuqt_FmA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> period.  Why is this any better than 18 or 36 months?  I would like to
> ensure that we're not going to need to change this in the short term
> due to guessing at this stage.

if i understand yesterday's presentation, it is to match (for some
unstated reason), arin's justification window.

i find this strange.  are we going to adjust to also match some others'
windows?  are were going to have a global policy on the window?  if we
need to coordinate all parameters globally, why do we need rirs?

randy