Hi，Sanjaya and All,
Thanks for your work. I think adding a definition of 'discrete networks'
to the IPv6 Guideline Document can achieve the goal of pro-099.
However, the wording of "with separate ASNs" is somehow confusing.
I suggest to remove the word of "with separate ASNs", since "the
prefixes of these multihomed networks can be advertised either
internally, or externally, with SAME ASN or separate ASNs".
So my suggested wordings are:
Discrete Networks
-----------------
Where an organization demonstrates a compelling need, or requirement, to
build discrete networks due to regulatory, geographic, or operational
reasons and these multihomed networks are advertised either internally,
or externally, the network may be defined by APNIC as being composed of
discrete networks.
Any comments or corrections?
Best regards,
xing