Dear Xing,Thank you for your comment. I have no issues with your suggested wording. It covers the cases we saw in the large network requests.
Cheers, Sanjaya On 4/08/2012 3:05 AM, Xing Li wrote:
Hi，Sanjaya and All, Thanks for your work. I think adding a definition of 'discrete networks' to the IPv6 Guideline Document can achieve the goal of pro-099. However, the wording of "with separate ASNs" is somehow confusing. I suggest to remove the word of "with separate ASNs", since "the prefixes of these multihomed networks can be advertised either internally, or externally, with SAME ASN or separate ASNs". So my suggested wordings are: Discrete Networks ----------------- Where an organization demonstrates a compelling need, or requirement, to build discrete networks due to regulatory, geographic, or operational reasons and these multihomed networks are advertised either internally, or externally, the network may be defined by APNIC as being composed of discrete networks. Any comments or corrections? Best regards, xing