Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal

To: Satoru Tsurumaki <satoru.tsurumaki at g.softbank dot co dot jp>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
From: Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho at mesh dot ad dot jp>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:44:38 +0900
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <CAHXx+kQuvq4dBF-p+PJpeMH8DmAzMtKHAXq-6rnDO3_b5xkX8g at mail dot gmail dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_Opn0QzX_ohNORcGdq+g1kMzVcdZgquhExcoJDqiMzHgiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHXx+kQuvq4dBF-p+PJpeMH8DmAzMtKHAXq-6rnDO3_b5xkX8g@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1


Just to clarify, I did not say that I was
for or against this proposal. It is really
important for this community to communicate
with each other on how they feel about the
current situation. This proposal is giving us
the chance. So I think stating those 'concerns'
is what is really important.

Seiichi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature