Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal

To: Benson Schliesser <bensons at queuefull dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:04:02 +0900
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <4FFC58CA.5020507 at queuefull dot net>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_Opn0QzX_ohNORcGdq+g1kMzVcdZgquhExcoJDqiMzHgiQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120710.114801.214427273.fujisaki@syce.net> <20120710120322.705B.29440226@null.nu> <m27gucb1sf.wl%randy@psg.com> <4FFC58CA.5020507@queuefull.net>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

>> little difference if they get it or they do not.  ipv4 is gone.
> Can you be more specific about what "ipv4 is gone" actually means?
> (Most of the Internet that I use is still IPv4. I.e. Some people
> cannot get over the fact that IPv6 is still nascent.)

this sig is about address allocation policy in the apnic region.  apnic 
'ran out' of ipv4 last year.  we are on the 'final /8' for which there
is clear and agreed policy, see
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-062

or were you just being uselessly pedantic?

randy