Re: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
> a policy, I don't see major differences between APNIC and ITU as a
> ordinary community member.
i suspect that you don't understand the itu or itu-t structure. but
that is not very relevant as you were just being sensationalist. the
sad fact is that most rir policy wonks are jealous of the itu-t, and
want to meet in smoke filled rooms, drink brandy, and make big
decisions.
ipv4 is gone. yes, some people can not get over that, but it makes
little difference if they get it or they do not. ipv4 is gone. and
we have agreed not to change the final /8 policy. did i say ipv4 is
gone?
ipv6 is sufficiently plentiful that policies, as opposed to practices,
are really not needed. though i am sure policy weenies such as owen
delong and others in my .procmailrc need a career fine-tuning how many
angles can dance on the head of a pin. it won't move packets one bit
better.
and, as the policy suggests, just as in all other aspects of apnic
operations, should an emergency arise, the ec can always act, or if time
is not of the essence, they can form a wg or a sig. whatever.
randy