Re: [sig-policy] Global Policy Update : Status of GPP-IPv4-2011 (prop-09
Hi all,
Latest update for Global Policy GPP-IPv4-2011 was also posted
to the ARIN PPML.
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2012-March/024389.html
Yours Sincerely,
--
Tomohiro Fujisaki
From: (Tomohiro -INSTALLER- Fujisaki) <fujisaki at syce dot net>
Subject: [sig-policy] Global Policy Update : Status of GPP-IPv4-2011 (prop-097)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:42:56 +0900 (JST)
|
| Hi all,
|
| At the Open Policy meeting last week in New Delhi we were scheduled to
| have a report on the progress of the Global Policy Proposal: "Global
| Policy Proposal for Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation Mechanisms by
| IANA". Unfortunately we didn't have time to report, so I send
| the detail of this proposal with recent update below.
|
| GPP-IPv4-2011 (prop-097 in APNIC):
| "Global Policy Proposal for Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation
| Mechanisms by IANA"
|
| Status Summary:
| This global policy reached consensus in all regions. ASO/AC forwarded
| this Global Policy to ICANN for ratification, and now waiting for the
| action of ICANN Boards.
|
| Please don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions.
|
| Yours Sincerely,
| --
| Tomohiro Fujisaki
|
| ----------8<----------8=----------8<----------8=----------8<----------
| Global Policy Update - Status of Prop-097
|
| The Address Supporting Organisation Address Council (ASO AC) reference
| for this proposal is GPP-IPv4-2011. The proposal was first introduced
| in APNIC region and recognized by ASO AC as GPP candidate 3 February
| 2011. The authors of the proposal are:
|
| Author: Philip Smith
| Co-authors: Alejandro Acosta, Nicolas Antoniello, S. Moonesamy,
| Douglas Onyango, Medel Ramirez, Masato Yamanishi
|
|
| The proposal was proposed in each of the five RIR regions and made
| progress as follows:
|
|
| GPP-IPv4-2011 at APNIC
| ======================
| Proposal Reference: prop-097
| http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-097
| Introduced: 25 January 2011
| Discussed at APNIC 31: 21 - 25 August 2011
| Final Comments: 1 March - 26 April 2011
| Endorsed by APNIC EC: 6 May 2011
|
| GPP-IPv4-2011 at LACNIC
| =======================
| Proposal Reference: LAC-2011-05
| http://lacnic.net/en/politicas/propuesta-politicas.html
| Introduced: 18 March 2011
| Discussed at LACNIC XV: 15 - 20 May 2011
| Final Comments: 27 May - 11 July 2011
| Ratified by LACNIC Board: 19 July 2011
|
| GPP-IPv4-2011 at RIPE NCC
| =========================
| Proposal Reference: RIPE 2011-01
| http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-01
| Introduced: 21 March 2011
| Discussed at RIPE 62: 2 - 6 May 2011
| Final Comments: 6 September - 4 October 2011
| Accepted by RIPE community: 20 October 2011
|
| GPP-IPv4-2011 at AfriNIC
| ========================
| Proposal Reference: AFPUB-2011-v4-004
| http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/AFPUB-2011-v4-004-draft-01.htm
| Introduced: 28 April 2011
| Discussed at AfriNIC 14: 4 - 10 June 2011
| Final Comments: 29 July - 16 August 2011
| Ratified by AfriNIC Board: 21 November 2011
|
| GPP-IPv4-2011 at ARIN
| =====================
| Proposal Reference: ARIN-2011-9
| https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2011_9.html
| Introduced: 8 March 2011 (prop-137)
| Adopted by ARIN AC: 18 August 2011
| Introduced to PPML: 24 August 2011
| Discussed at ARIN XXVIII: 12 - 14 October 2011
| Revised rationale: 22 September 2011
| Last Call: 19 October - 2 November 2011
| AC recommended adoption: 22 November 2011
| Adopted by ARIN Board of Trustees: 16 December 2011
|
| The following paragraph was added in the ARIN region to the rationale:
|
| The NRO must clarify that this Global Policy is not intended to
| supersede the IETF’s right to make IPv4 assignments for “specialised
| address blocks (such as multicast or anycast blocks)” as documented
| in section 4.3 of RFC 2860. The NRO and IANA should coordinate with
| the IETF to make such assignments as necessary, and honor any
| reservations made for works currently in progress.
|
|
|
| After the proposal reached consensus in all five RIR regions we moved
| into the Ratification Phase. The GPP Process is defined by the ASO
| Memorandum of Understanding
| (http://www.icann.org/en/aso/aso-mou-29oct04.htm) and Attachment A -
| GPDP (http://www.icann.org/en/aso/aso-mou-attachmentA-29oct04.htm)
|
|
| The Ratification Phase has the following steps:
|
| 1. NRO EC informs the ASO AC that the proposal has reached agreement in
| the five RIR regions
| 2. Address Council review the proposal
| 3. ICANN Board Ratification
|
| The ASO AC received the notification from the NRO EC and have
| undertaken their review under the following process:
|
| ASO Address Council Review
| ==========================
| ASO AC Operating Procedures
| http://aso.icann.org/documents/operating-procedures-aso-ac/
|
| Policy Proposal Facilitator Team (PPFT)
|
| Within sixty (60) days AC will either Pass to ICANN for ratification
| as a global policy; Advise the NRO EC of any concerns; or Request the
| NRO EC for a time extension
|
| At a meeting of the ASO AC on 8 March 2012 a resolution was passed
| unanimously that GPP-IPv4-2011 should be forwarded to ICANN
| and forwarded to ICANN for their action as outlined below:
|
| ICANN Board and GPP-IPv4-2011
| =============================
| Resolved to track GPP-IPv4-2011: 21 April 2011
| http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-26apr11-en.htm
| Board procedures for ratification
| http://www.icann.org/en/general/review-procedures-pgp.html
|
| Within sixty (60) days the ICANN Board may either:
| Accept by a simple majority vote; or
| Reject by a supermajority (2/3) vote; or
| Request changes by a simple majority vote; or
| take no action (deemed to be accepted)
|
| * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
| _______________________________________________
| sig-policy mailing list
| sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
| http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
|